D90 review part two - Action
The D90 can shoot at 4.5 fps versus 3 fps of the D80. That elevates it to another level as an option for sports and action photography in my opinion. I personally think the lower limit for a usuable motordrive is around 3.5 fps, below that it is more like an old time “winder” - usable for advancing to the next single frame, but not for action sequences. At 3 fps and slower you wait for the camera and register in your mind the moments you miss.
Why I think the limit is around 3.5 fps is based on my sports shooting experience with Nikon FM/FE cameras and the 3.5 fps MD11/12 motordrive some decades ago. With that combo I have shot soccer, ice-hockey, handboll, volleyball , tennis, track and field and other sports. I considered the speed to be OK, also often for series. When the FM2 was introduced the frame rate with the MD12 was lowered to 3.2 and now it started to feel slowish. I am not refering to sequences only - after all the best photo in a series is often the first shot. But also the general response, the feel that you are instantly ready for a new shot or series of shots.
Naturally the 6-8 fps of a D300 is better, but 4.5 fps with a D90 is workable. The second important factor for action shooting is of course the AF. How does the combination of fps and AF work in real action? That was an important factor for me to find out, deciding if the D90 would be an acceptable alternative to a D300.
The Schnauzer test

Trying to get sharp photos of a small dog running at full speed against the camera is a quite challenge for most cameras. The D300 passed this test with flying colors, when I tried it last winter (see my D300 review), but I must say the D90 did OK. Especially considering that I used the 18-105 VR kit lens on the D90, while the 70-200VR was used on the D300. This is from a sequence with 5 of 6 frames in focus.

See whole series at the end of this gallery.
Indoor sports
But I wanted some more tests. Indoor sports can be a nightmare to shoot with many cameras. Low light levels as a rule and difficult white balance which increases noise even more. Wide aperture lenses with short DOF and fast action challenges the AF system - a perfect test of a cameras abilities under stress. These abilities are not only important for pros, but also for “soccer-moms” and “soccer-dads” (I dont mean it in a disrespectful way - I have been a soccer-dad myself). Many people like to take photos of their kids sports activities, but the conditions are often very difficult in dim gym halls, or late evenings o the soccer field.
I borrowed the camera for a few days to my brother which is professional press photographer with 20+ years of experience. He tried it in a badmintonhall and on a handball match. He has a lot of experience with D300 and came back very positive of the D90s performance. All shots are between ISO 1600 and 3200. Or rather between ISO 3200 and 6400 - I forgot that I had set the camera to Active D-Lightning extra high, before handing it over to him. Since he never uses ADL he never noticed that it was on. (Make a mental note - dont forget to switch off extreme settings…). ADL extra high decreases RAW exposure about a full stop that has to be recovered in post processing, which naturally increases noise levels.
The badminton shots were made with a Sigma 30 1.4 set to F 2.0 and at close range with the limited focal length. Very difficult to shot with a DOF that is to shallow to cover the whole player. Very fast action in very bad light. Expecting all shots in focus would be unrealistic, but a fairly good amount of shots were keepers. If it had been a real job the result would be satisfactory.

The advantage of RAW
As a side note - I usually call my self mainly a jpeg shooter, trying to get it as right as possible in the camera (but of course some PP). But I am starting to shift my attitude. The latest version of ACR (I use Photoshop professionally, so in my workflow I prefer ACR, even though Nikon Capture NX gives better results at high ISOs.) does not render bad colors, the way older versions did. And in indoor sports it is a big advantage to be able to tweak white balance in post processing. Here is a tweaked jpeg versus a tweaked RAW (second image).


Handball
These were shot from the stands, since it was not a real assaignment. The lens was a 70-200VR 2.8. Here the AF worked fine, naling most shots. A performance good enough even for a professional job.


Handball is a physical sport:

4.5 fps is fast enough for short series:


Busy goal keepers:


A last jump shot:

In conclusion - the D90 capabilties in AF and fps makes it capable as an allround alternative. I consider it a basic pro camera that can get the job done, even action and sports.
Next chapter: Video and conclusion
D90 review part one: Camera body and image quality here.

Peter | Dec 8, 2008 | Reply
Hi. Very nice and thanks for the review. I am contemplating a D90 w 18-105 lens. Can you please tell me: what memory card were you using for high fps shots? I am wondering about the need to buy an Sandisk Extreme III card 30 MB/S edition. Don’t know if it is worth it. Peter
PL | Dec 9, 2008 | Reply
Glad you liked it Peter. I have an 8 Gb Sandisk Extreme III - I dont if it is a 30 MB/s version, or if there are different versions.
Bill Wallace | Jan 10, 2009 | Reply
PerL, thanks so much for your informative well written viewpoints. I am on the fence about the D300 (have a D200 and some glass already/also shoot Olympus). The D90 may be a good stop gap until the D400 comes about.
One question about the D90 is how versatile is it with the Nikon flash system.
Just wanted to thank you and let you know this is one of the best blogs I have come across.
Bill
PL | Jan 10, 2009 | Reply
Thank you Bill, positive feedback like yours makes me motivated to continue writing.
I think the D90 is very strong in price/performance for the moment - an excellent stop gap as you write. As for the flash - I am not a big flash user - since my SB600 was lost I only use the SB400. But I think the D90 has the same capabilities with the Nikon flash system as the D300.
D | Jan 19, 2009 | Reply
Any chance you could redo the Schnausser-test with the 70 - 200 lens as you did for the D300 to see how it differs? Those pics don’t look to hot but i think the lens used might make it look worse then it is.
PL | Jan 19, 2009 | Reply
To D:
I might make a “running dog” test with the 70-200VR on the D90 later. I will add it to the text in that case. Or I try some more action shots at handball or maybe some outdoor sports.
D | Jan 19, 2009 | Reply
Awesome, whichever would be greatly appreciated.
Mikael | Feb 26, 2009 | Reply
Per,
I found your webpage by chance.
Owning the D90 and am wating for my 70-200mm f/2.8 to arrive - possibly tomorrow
I enjoyed reading your review - well done.
Kind regards,
Mikael
PL | Feb 27, 2009 | Reply
To Mikael
Congratulations, you have bought a superb lens. And if you get a TC14 or TC17 you have great long range solution too.
Te | Dec 30, 2009 | Reply
Hello
Thank you for taking the time to compare. your comparison photos are super helpful. I am struggling to decide between the D90 or 300. I am still amateur phtographer for sure but I am leaning to the D90 for budget but need higher end for possible work. As mentioned earlier, I think this could be a good middle ground until I can afford better.
What do you think of the 18-200mm lens? I ask because I shoot action in sandy/windy/dusty areas and like the idea of quickly getting close and distance without changing lenses
Thanks, Te
Te | Dec 30, 2009 | Reply
sorry, I just saw your review of the 18-200mm lens so please disregard above
Thanks, Te
Ken Zifer Sr. | Sep 6, 2010 | Reply
Please help,D90, 70/200mm 2.8 lens football field at night. What Manual settings should I start with.
Thanks for your precious time,
Ken